next up previous
Next: Phase Sensitivity Up: Phase Coherence in a Previous: The DMRG-Algorithm

Friedel Oscillations

The decay of the density oscillations induced by a defect is a long-standing problem in solid state physics. This phenomenon, called Friedel or Ruderman-Kittel oscillations (depending on the context), is closely related to the singularity in the response function for wave-vectors close to tex2html_wrap_inline879 . It is expected that asymptotically, the induced density decays as

  equation66

Using the DMRG, we have computed tex2html_wrap_inline881 for a system of 200 sites and various interaction strengths and, as a test for the accuracy of our calculation, for systems with M=500 and tex2html_wrap_inline885 . The impurity is chosen antisymmetrically for technical reasons, tex2html_wrap_inline887 . We consider a half-filled band, i.e. tex2html_wrap_inline889 , where j is the distance (in units of the lattice spacing) from the defect. A sample of our results is shown in Fig. 1, where we plot, on a logarithmic scale, the magnitude tex2html_wrap_inline893 versus distance. Clearly, it is possible to extract the exponent tex2html_wrap_inline763 without difficulty. We emphasize that the algebraic decay starts already at a few lattice site sites. Typically, we have used a basis of m=120 (200) states for the M=200 (500) system, and performed four sweeps through the lattice.

   figure72
Figure 1: Decay of the Friedel oscillations induced by weak impurities, located summetrically at the ends of the chain ( tex2html_wrap_inline751 ). The increase for large j arises due to the finiteness of the chain. The calculations are performed at half filling, N=M/2, keeping m=120 (200) states per block for M=200 (500). The amplitude of the oscillation vanishes for tex2html_wrap_inline761 .

The exponent tex2html_wrap_inline763 as a function of the nearest-neighbor interaction V is given in Fig. 2. The exponent tex2html_wrap_inline763 decreases with increasing repulsive interaction, and increases with attractive interaction, compared to the value for non-interacting fermions, tex2html_wrap_inline945 (one dimension!).

   figure153
Figure: The exponent tex2html_wrap_inline763 vs. interaction, for the same impurity as in Fig. 1. The continous line is the asymptotic result [20].

Qualitatively, this trend agrees with the prediction [19] based on the Luttinger liquid. In a recent preprint [20], tex2html_wrap_inline763 was related to the ``dressed charge'' of the (clean) model, with the result tex2html_wrap_inline961 , where tex2html_wrap_inline963 , related to V through tex2html_wrap_inline967 , parameterizes the interaction. The expression tex2html_wrap_inline969 is also shown in Fig. 2, and is in almost perfect agreement with our numerical data, except for V>1 where we find that the oscillations decay more weakly than predicted. This seems to be related to the crossover (for a weak impurity, and V>0) found in [19], i.e. for the system sizes studied we may not yet be in the asymptotic regime. We have preliminary results showing that for a strong impurity, tex2html_wrap_inline763 tends to increase towards the asymptotic result given in [20].


next up previous
Next: Phase Sensitivity Up: Phase Coherence in a Previous: The DMRG-Algorithm

Peter Schmitteckert
Thu Apr 4 00:23:49 MES 1996